[Apostate's post went up while writing mine, so he's preempted my comments on choosing Casey to be the Christian whipper!]
Even if Falun Gong's claims against the Chinese government are true, I have a hard time seeing how a couple of foreigners external to this conflict whipping each other in Australia can be seen as substituting the justice required for more than 3000 people murdered and butchered for body parts in China. It seems like an insult to the people directly affected by such atrocities. Are we to believe that people who allegedly butcher others would be convicted by people whipping each other as proxies for what they would like to do to them? Do they even know that it happened, or even care? So what purpose does it serve?
Dave claims:
Dave wrote:
So in many ways the whipping was being taken in solidarity with their victims; and I think that is why so many people in the audience were moved to tears...
I am guessing the victims tears would be out of sorrow for the brutality that they, or their colleagues have suffered, and that for them, the whipping represents the dehumanising torture of an oppressive authority, and NOT any kind of justice or resolution to their suffering. In effect it enflames their grief and anger. I can't see this as anything more than a gross exploitation of some one else's suffering.
Even Peter who has been expressing his admiration for their commitment has found cause to pause after viewing the video:
redyucca wrote:
Now as for the whipping, that looks very very painful and bad. who does the whipping? is it a guard or authority or what?I cannot imagine whipping someone is a job anyone would enjoy unless they are a sickie...
Dave explained:
Dave wrote:
...We spent some time experimenting with various people cracking the whip before arriving at Casey as the most suitable volunteer...
David Jose who was given this task last time ended up regretting it and leaving. But what if Casey, who it seems has an aptitude for cracking whips, finds he likes it? This is the guy whose original avatar featured the motto "Life is Pain" and a graphic of a guy poking someone in the eye!
As apostate points out, the concept of whipping someone as if its "being done unto the Lord" is quite strange indeed.
Peter's instinctive response to seeing the whipping indicated repulsion:
redyucca wrote:
If you get more video of anything (not the whipping part i'll admit i didnt like seeing that myself...
But then we see a new conditioned behaviour seeking to overide the god-given instinct:
Peter wrote:
...but if the men from the Jesus Christians were gutsy enough to take the whippings in place of those who should be taking it- i need to man up and not look away...
There is nothing "manly" in hardening one's heart to accept pointless brutality.
Forsake this darkness now!